Comment by ilamont
"I don't see anything about AI that will reduce the need for copyeditors and proofreaders."
Former copyeditor here. That ship has already sailed. The suits realized the copy desk was a cost center that they could live without.
For the most part they were right. The burden of copyediting and proofing fell to writers and editors. Print publications were closed down, and everything shifted to digital, meaning errors could be corrected after the fact (often after readers caught the mistakes). Technology also helped catch errors before publication (spelling and grammar checks, software like grammarly, etc.)
All the people with that title I used to work with were laid off years ago and are in different careers now (mostly in marketing, but one person is an emergency services trainer).
I think where the real skills gap exists in the AI world is fact checking and getting the "voice" right. I don't think the hallucinations problem will be solved, and AI generated and copyedited text is so milquetoast.
i work in academia; our authors definitely still need copyeditors.