Comment by eloisant

Comment by eloisant 6 days ago

To be honest there were a lot of mobile OSes at the time supporting multitasking, like Windows CE, because they were desktop OS (Linux for Maemo, Windows for CE) with little adaptation for mobile. That meant performances and battery life were not great.

That's why those OS were mostly used by geeks and power users, and "regular" users were using feature phones that "just work".

One of the strength of iOS and Android were to create a completely different userspace that what we had in desktop OS, more adapted to mobile. They combined the "just works" aspect of feature phones with the power of smartphones.

RiverCrochet 6 days ago

Windows CE is quite internally different than Windows NT. It still does support multitasking, but kernel version 5 (which was on all the CE devices of the late 2000's/early 2010's) had a maximum of 32 processes. It was a platform specifically for embedded use, though the GUI was styled to resemble Windows OSes at the time and of course numerous Microsoft things were ported over.

Windows Phone 7 moved to CE 6.0, then Windows Phone 8 to 10 were NT based.

Wikipedia says Windows Phone 8 was released October 29. 2012, which is around the time the ARM-based Surface RT was also released. A significant event for Windows NT to be on an architecture other than x86.

Reply View 1 reply

zozbot234 6 days ago

> A significant event for Windows NT to be on an architecture other than x86.
Yeah, I too liked to run Windows NT 3.1 initial release on my DEC Alpha and MIPS workstations. Wait, what?
(I think you meant to say that the support for ARM32 specifically in Windows RT and the NT-based Windows Mobile 8+ was a noteworthy milestone, which I suppose is a fair point.)

Reply View | 0 replies

potatolicious 6 days ago

+1. I sometimes hear nostalgia for the N900 but personally I don't get it.

Anybody could run a full multi-tasking OS on a mobile device trivially. The performance sucked and you killed your battery super quickly.

The innovation was in multitasking that didn't result in a terrible user experience, and it took a lot to get there! And the answer wasn't "welp what if we just treated this thing like a desktop".

And it's still not a fully solved problem - there continues to be a lot of movement around how apps are defined so that they can be efficiently concurrent! (or at least give the appearance of concurrency)

Reply View 1 reply

jldugger 6 days ago

My recollection was that the N900 battery lasted about a full day of normal use. Maybe two but it was a dice roll. That was pretty much on par with other smartphones on the market. IIRC the main thing android and iOS were doing was shutting down apps to save memory. But perhaps I saved a ton of battery by not buying a data plan? At the time, I had wifi at home and work, and a 100 dollar a year prepaid cell plan.
And the UI did have plenty of affordances. Basically all the apps were custom, and I vaguely recall there being something close to the home / back on screen button android used in the early days. Heck, it's still a pita to switch apps on my Pixel: swipe up, but not too fast, or it'll bring up the full app list instead of the switcher.
But sure, there's plenty to dislike about the n900: it had a resistive touch screen and a stylus. Turn by turn navigation sucked for most of its life. The app store launch was so botched that it was basically dead on arrival. The microusb port sucks.

Reply View | 0 replies

hajile 6 days ago

Elop refused to launch the Nokia N9 in ANY of their primary markets. He refused to advertise the phone AT ALL.

Despite that, the phone sold several million devices and people were paying huge premiums (often $200-400 over price) to get it shipped from these secondary markets to where they lived.

The demand was there and Elop decided to kill it anyway. He also never released the second phone required by their Meego contract with Intel as I recall.

Reply View 0 replies

nextos 6 days ago

> That's why those OS were mostly used by geeks and power users, and "regular" users were using feature phones that "just work".

The N9, N900's successor, shipped with MeeGo 1.2 "Harmattan" and had the most simple and elegant UI I've ever seen on a mobile. The phone-UI combination was a masterpiece. But it was still Linux, with all power-user features under the hood.

Reply View 0 replies

zozbot234 6 days ago

Windows CE had nothing to do with Windows the desktop OS. We're talking entirely different codebases running on different kinds of hardware.

Reply View 0 replies