Comment by ryandrake

Comment by ryandrake 4 days ago

8 replies

You wouldn't need a sudden jump. If you had a rocket that accelerated at a pleasant 1G forever, you could reach and stop at the center of the milky way in about 20 (your time) years, and you could reach and stop at the Andromeda galaxy in about 28 years. Play around with some of the online space travel relativity calculators--it's wild!

Of course building and fueling such a rocket is what's totally out of reach.

TimTheTinker 4 days ago

> Of course building and fueling such a rocket is what's totally out of reach.

We'd need a device that could efficiently transform several kg of matter to photons.

  • lukan 4 days ago

    Also some kind of a energy shield. Space is pretty empty, but if you go fast enough, you will still hit lots of non empty space.

  • widforss 4 days ago

    And back?

    • TimTheTinker 5 hours ago

      No, it would direct the photons out the back of the space craft, producing a beam intense enough to vaporize any solids or liquids close by. This beam would ideally be able to provide perhaps 1G or so of continuous acceleration.

aledalgrande 4 days ago

Is there drag in space? I.e. would you need increasing energy to accelerate at a constant rate as the speed goes up?

  • ryandrake 4 days ago

    With a traditional rocket, I believe you'd need decreasing energy to maintain the same acceleration as the flight progressed, since you are carrying along with you and burning the fuel, and so the total mass (payload + fuel) that needs to be accelerated is constantly decreasing.

    Of course there's the pesky problem that for every N kg of mass you want to accelerate at 1G for that kind of a trip, you're probably going to need somewhere on the order of N billion kg of fuel to burn.

  • [removed] 3 days ago
    [deleted]
  • dmoy 4 days ago

    I guess one assumes that whatever system prevents you from getting hulled by space dust also removes the drag from the equation?