Comment by qingcharles 6 days ago
I'm always interested in ways to increase the quality of GIF rendering. There are absolutely tons of places that still need GIF support, either because they don't allow video uploads, or because the videos don't auto-play.
Gifski uses the png-quant library, and I wonder how this compares?
working with GIF is valid but it is incredibly sad how it's still the only widely supported silent autoplaying video...
(I guess APNG is supported in many browsers, but uploading one often results in deleterious resizing/recompressing operations that ruins the animation. Discord uses APNG and webp for stickers afaik)
APNG and animated WEBP are blocked and/or unsupported practically everywhere I try. And I try a lot of places to test it. Reddit supports neither, yet allows GIFs. It's sad.
GIF rendering is a big use case.
pngquant was a big comparison subject during development (it's a brilliant piece of work, and a mature tool that does a few things more than just quantizing). Take it with a grain of salt of course, but in terms of raw quantization performance, patolette had the edge, particularly when dealing with images with tricky color distributions. With that said, pngquant's dithering algorithm is way more sophisticated (and animation aware, I think). In fact, one thing where it really shines is that it spots with pretty good precision where adding noise would actually hurt instead of helping.
Another thing is that patolette can quantize to both high and lower color counts (the latter particularly with CIELuv), whereas pngquant is more well suited for high color counts.