Comment by fsckboy

Comment by fsckboy 8 days ago

5 replies

the reason property plant and equipment is amortized over time instead of expensed right away is to match up the tax deduction with the profit. If building a factory and filling it with robots will produce cars over a 10 year period in the future, it makes sense to subtract those costs over the same 10 year period. Matching profits with expenses is essentially why accounting was invented in the first place, so financial statements would show smoother and continuous operation of a smooth and continuous company, instead of big peaks and valleys as if something had happened.

With software companies, developing software (like Microsoft Windows) allows you to profit from that software over the next 5 years. Matching profits with expenses makes rational sense.

Frequenty, politicians use the tax code to implement popular social policy. This way they can reward things and groups they want to, and still be able to say "we aren't giving subsidies, we aren't giving people cash, we are simply giving tax deductions and tax credits" These sorts of programs are, across the board, more distorting of the economy and make the tax code incomprehensibly more complex. But matching expenses against profits? makes perfect sense.

throwawaymaths 7 days ago

yeah but a high risk venture going from zero has exactly this problem: you might fail to build your product, and crazy enough the weight of having x% tax may have made the difference.

you should be able to choose if you'd like to do immediate accounting or amortized accounting.

  • fsckboy 7 days ago

    investors pay tax on profits, write off losses. The investors can add money in if they feel the idea is good. The tax code should not tilt the balance of the market.

    people on this site complaining about lobbyists, regulatory capture etc, up and down the page, but wanting their own industry favored is a great illustration of the problems we face.

    • throwawaymaths 7 days ago

      no, it's not wanting to be favored, it's wanting to be treated the same as any other company with expenses.

      • fsckboy 6 days ago

        the accounting rules that require capitalizing R&D are the same for all companies, and the amortization is expensed.

        • throwawaymaths 4 days ago

          yeah read the whole thread. im arguing that R&D (im not talking about software R&D) should not be special cased as an expense class and a company should be allowed to choose to depreciate or not (just declare which).

          ianal but my understanding is:

          Under Section 179 of the IRS code, businesses can elect to expense the cost of a fixed asset in the year of purchase, subject to certain limits and restrictions