Zekio 8 days ago

Readme only mentions linux, so why bother mentioning Mac OS?

Reply View 8 replies
  • cls59 8 days ago

    README also leads with a screenshot that has macOS window styling. So, "works on Mac" is a reasonable first impression to draw.

    Reply View 4 replies
    • qualeed 8 days ago

      Before you get to that screenshot, you have to get past the big, bold sentence that says "A human-friendly alternative to netstat for socket and port monitoring on Linux.".

      Reply View 0 replies
  • at0mic22 7 days ago

    Cause it's obviously a Rust crate, you would kinda hope that it might compile at MacOs. In 99% of cases that works.

    Reply View 2 replies
    • diggan 7 days ago

      If a Rust crate uses anything from the OS, and doesn't mention that OS, I wouldn't expect it to work on that OS, regardless if it's Windows, Linux or macOS. Just like graphical crates state what APIs they support, and if Metal is not mentioned for example, it is most likely not supported.

      Reply View 1 reply
      • at0mic22 7 days ago

        You wouldn't know unless running crate install.

        I use lsof -i a lot on Mac, its not that I'm criticizing, but mostly disappointed.

        Reply View 0 replies
insane_dreamer 8 days ago

The title `A human-friendly alternative to netstat for socket and port monitoring on Linux` is pretty clear.

Reply View 2 replies
  • at0mic22 7 days ago

    Nah, homebrew made apple guys believe they get pretty much everything Linux has. Who would expect an exception?

    Reply View 1 reply
hollow64 6 days ago

sorry for the confusion about the macos like screenshot, I changed it to look more like Ubuntu

Reply View 0 replies