Comment by simonw

Comment by simonw 16 hours ago

18 replies

View on Hacker News

That's the thing where if you have significant assets your family members get kidnapped until you irreversibly transfer those assets to criminals, right?

I'm not sure how crypto continues to gain mainstream adoption in the face of that, no matter how much excitement there is for it in the current US administration.

My previous argument was that a technology where losing your password means you lose your net worth was incompatible with how human beings actually work. This kidnapping thing appears to be getting a whole lot more media coverage than that.

pawelduda 15 hours ago

Kidnapping and ransom existed before crypto

Reply View 6 replies
  • simonw 13 hours ago

    Reducing the barrier to successfully executing a kidnapping-for-cash turns out to make that crime more common.

    Reply View 0 replies
  • sigwinch 15 hours ago

    That’s not his argument. You must ensure the anonymity of criminals in order to also protect the anonymity of your innocent relatives.

    Reply View 0 replies
  • jsheard 15 hours ago

    So did pump and dump scams, but crypto brought in a new golden age of pumping and dumping. It's a matter of scale and ease of execution.

    Reply View 3 replies
    • pawelduda 15 hours ago

      Getting kidnapped happens against victim's will, whereas getting into a global PvP casino, taking a risk and getting burned is self-inflicted. Sure, it's easy to fall into it when everyone, especially celebrities shill these scams but still, nobody's holding gun to anyone's head here. I've bet on wrong thing many times but ultimately it was my choice

      Reply View 2 replies
      • surgical_fire 15 hours ago

        Are you really arguing that victims of scams deserve it if no violence or coercion was involved?

        Reply View 1 reply
        • pawelduda 14 hours ago

          Absolutely not, it's not up to me or you to decide whether someone deserves to be scammed. Just saying it's a gamble many choose to take.

          Reply View 0 replies
bediger4000 15 hours ago

The irreversible transfer is a large part of the attraction isn't it? Your business policy may be "no refunds", but customers paying with credit cards have a decent chance of a refund from Visa or MasterCard. Now your "no refunds" business, which might be on the scammy side, has to deal with Visa's lawyers per charge backs.

Irreversible transactions make scammy businesses more profitable.

Reply View 2 replies
  • simonw 13 hours ago

    Sure, that's attractive to vendors. It's not attractive to consumers.

    Reply View 1 reply
    • bediger4000 13 hours ago

      Hence advocating cryptocurrency based on other aspects of it. Irreversible transactions plus decentralized means scammy businesses are more profitable and harder to be rid of.

      Reply View 0 replies
imhoguy 15 hours ago

Kidnapping for ransom was a thing in human history even before money was invented. And money could be lost in many other irreversible scenarios, like fire, government confiscation or devaluation.

So was speculation.

Crypto is just another value carrier. Password is just a risk factor, like trust in govt is.

Reply View 2 replies
  • hkt 15 hours ago

    Banks can potentially act as gateways that prevent large transactions that are otherwise possible with crypto. They can do this simply by saying that for any amount above a certain level, you need to attend in person.

    The whole "time immemorial" argument is a little silly when we put it in the context of modernity: we have safeguards people didn't have "before money was invented" because we're the beneficiaries of a sophisticated set of social rules intended to protect people. Getting rid of those safeguards because they're recent is fairly likely to make our lives worse.

    Reply View 1 reply
pydry 15 hours ago

That's sort of the point, I think. It's like buying an index tracker in the underground economy.

Reply View 2 replies
  • qqqult 15 hours ago

    eh, it was fair to say that 8 years ago...

    now it's way easier to track public blockchain transaction chains on Bitcoin, Ethereum and the like than it is to track bank transfers across countries

    Reply View 1 reply
    • pydry 15 hours ago

      Yet once you strip out speculation the underground economy is still by far the predominant user of blockchain transactions.

      Bank transfers are A) linked to a passport and B) can be blocked.

      Reply View 0 replies
survirtual 15 hours ago

That's the thing, fighting against kings and monarchs with a stranglehold on the colonies means you get invaded by a world superpower, right? Who would tolerate fighting for freedom if it means getting murdered? Such a short sighted pursuit that won't lead to anything better, it is foolish. Clearly we should bow down before the supreme authority and accept their benevolent ruling. /s

History has this way of repeating itself. And it seems the blind will never see. Those who can see, just keep working. Talk is cheap. We will drag humanity into the future kicking and screaming if needed, because we know what waits for us on the other side.

Reply View 1 reply
  • sigwinch 15 hours ago

    Well, this article is about the difference between USA (with its first businessman president) and the rest of the world. The businessman president offers the cheapest talk, and the greatest return on investment for those who can afford a private audience. The accelerationist future — is this what you mean by kicking and screaming?

    Reply View 0 replies