Comment by hatsunearu
Comment by hatsunearu a day ago
So was this trained on existing anime? Ain't no way the corpus was licensed legally.
Comment by hatsunearu a day ago
So was this trained on existing anime? Ain't no way the corpus was licensed legally.
Not like chatgtp and sora which as all we all known are fully trained in public licensed content free of copyright.
Exactly, that's why they aren't able to replicate the Studio Ghibli style.
Not that different. Bilibili is a big, above-board video streaming service; they definitely have distribution rights to a large collection of anime content. (They also have YouTube-style user uploads where proper licensing is less likely.)
It's the equivalent of Crunchyroll putting out a video generation model. If the rightsholders disagree with this usage, it'll come up during the negotiations for new releases.
OpenAI doesn't have an existing business based on licensing Studio Ghibli content, so the only option Studio Ghibli has to stop them is to sue them and hope that OpenAI is found to have infringed their copyright.
Bilibili does have an existing business based on licensing Studio Ghibli content, so Studio Ghibli can threaten to refuse to sell them distribution rights for future releases, even without a lawsuit.
Really? We've all seen the stories on how Meta sourced book content from Anna's Archive and still you try to claim things are different in China?
The right to train models on copyrighted data has yet to be determined.