Comment by molticrystal

>That kind of emotional writing does not become someone whose profession should focus on scientific persuasion.

What you'd probably prefer reading is one of the sources John Carlos Baez cites [0]:

Comment on “Gravitational Pair Production and Black Hole Evaporation” Antonio Ferreiro1, José Navarro-Salas, and Silvia Pla

Where they take the equation used in the paper, and outline how there is a better way than using that equation

"... is obtained to the lowest order in a perturbative expansion, while the standard way to obtain the non-perturbative Schwinger effect using the weak field approximation is to perform a resummation of all terms"

and how the one in the paper being critiqued can't handle situations arising from electromagnetic cases, much less the gravitational one properly. These are the statements Baez makes but the cited paper gives in a much more professional tone and method.

https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.13...