Comment by whilenot-dev

Comment by whilenot-dev a day ago

I would make a different list of points:

1. The "new" of today is no match for the "new" of back then: Breaking Bad is as good for a first binge today as it was 2008. I'm currently watching Mad Men for the first time and can't see how anything could've been made differently 18 years(!) ago. That's 7 seasons of a well-made show and I couldn't care less for any Netflix production that gets cancelled after its 2nd season. The change in quality from Star Trek: TNG to Breaking Bad seems like a huge leap, do these leaps exist anymore?

2. There is no discussion about any current Zeitgeist, everything feels intermixed and nothing is ever finished. Leaving politics aside here, consumers are beta testers without any way to provide direct feedback to producers (one that isn't public outrage of some kind) - every other usual customer interaction is just a waste of your time. Big studios are busy milking "universes" that have been created pre-social media.

3. Algorithms are part of the creation for these problems, not their solution. Big tech just doesn't like this take, creative work is risky, businesses need to scale up quickly and efficiently.

[removed] 19 hours ago

[deleted]

Reply View 0 replies

ghaff a day ago

>The "new" of today is no match for the "new" of back then

Breaking Bad is almost certainly one of the best series of all time that started strong and ended strong. There were a TON of shows in that period that were weak or that, at a minimum, sort of petered out. Yes, a lot of shows probably get canceled too quickly. Then there's Grey's Anatomy because it still apparently has lazy viewers who will tune in each week.

Reply View 0 replies

superultra 20 hours ago

We have ground breaking amazing shows like The Rehearsal (which could really only be made now), Resevoir Dogs, Shogun, Fleabag, The Bear, Severance, For All Mankind, Peaky Blinders…to name a few.There is so much good tv.

Some either you don’t know about any of these which is the fault of the algo I guess, or you’re stuck in a bubble of 15 years ago, in which the algo failed.

Reply View 2 replies

whilenot-dev 17 hours ago

I think my point didn't quite come across... Comedy got way more serious and certainly made that (necessary) leap after a big dive in quality during the 00s (thanks Chuck Lorre!). Writers of other genres learned from the successful HBO and AMC productions that TV shows are more than just a fixed universe with a static cast and a dynamic part, and that each episode could be more than one short story told in this staged universe - that is the main part in the leap that makes old shows feel old now.
Thanks for the recommendations, didn't know about The Rehearsal, Shogun, and Reservation Dogs (you wrote "Resevoir Dogs"?). Our tastes may wary, but I think For All Mankind fell back to some 90s formula after season 2.

Reply View | 0 replies
encom 10 hours ago

Slightly OT, but it's been a long time since I've been as disappointed with anything as I was with the last season (3) of The Bear. I made it three episodes in, then deleted it. The first seasons were so good.

Reply View | 0 replies

paleotrope a day ago

Re: 2, That's definitely another part of it. There's this timelessness about the current culture that I am not sure where it's coming from.

I find myself encountering bits of culture (tv/movies/music/books) that could be from today, or from 10 years ago, and little way to determine from when. And there's so much of it now.

Reply View 0 replies

zyx_db 20 hours ago

for point 1, i think this example is a bit biased. its not really fair to compare random shows made now to some of the greatest shows ever made.

although, i will say, it is a lot better of an experience watching old, well reviewed shows / movies, than it is to watch whatever comes out now. but again thats mainly because i can choose from some of the best productions ever.

Reply View 0 replies

BlueTemplar a day ago

Having watched TNG and BB for the first time roughly at the same time, I disagree it's that of a huge leap. (Quality is about much more than cinematography, and these two shows are just too different anyway.)

Also we have probably reached almost the top of what is possible for a TV show, especially in what matters the most (writing, acting).

Reply View 2 replies

whilenot-dev 15 hours ago

I wasn't referring to the cinematography. While that one's certainly noticeable, I think the way the shows narrative is structured and builds up over time is the true leap. The X-Files or Twin Peaks were maybe more cohesive, but that's also because mystery box shows wouldn't work very well any other way. Maybe that's it... cohesiveness found its way into TV productions, and it took mystery box shows to make that quality really obvious as a recipe?

Reply View | 1 reply
- Ekaros 14 hours ago
  
  Deep Space 9. Star Trek starting in late in TNG's. It had actually overarching narrative and story going beyond a few episode. Though still had those self-containt episodes.
  
  Reply View | 0 replies