I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney, who does work for YC and startups. AMA

249 points by proberts 2 days ago

476 comments | 2 pages

I'll be here for the next 5-6 hours. As usual, there are countless topics given the rapidly changing immigration landscape and I'll be guided by whatever you're concerned with. Please remember that I can't provide legal advice on specific cases because I won't have access to all the facts. Please stick to a factual discussion in your questions and I'll try to do the same in my answers.

Edit: I am taking a break now and will return later this afternoon/evening to respond to any comments and answer any questions. Thank you everyone for a great and engaged AMA so far.

ushakov 2 days ago

hi Peter!

how long does 221(g) administrative processing take to complete in your experience? anything one can do besides waiting (Russian citizen working in tech, almost 1yr without adjustments)?

  • proberts 2 days ago

    This really depends on the reason for the 221(g) and the applicant's country of citizenship or birth. Unfortunately, for those from certain countries, such as Iran and Russia, it has not been uncommon for such applications to go into a black hole and take 1-2 years. For those not from such countries, the process is relatively quick, from a couple of week to a couple of months.

[removed] 2 days ago
[deleted]
rathboma 2 days ago

Thanks for doing an AMA!

Should folks on H1B visas who have an ongoing green card application via PERM be concerned at all?

Would you advise not traveling until the i-495 is filed?

  • proberts 2 days ago

    No, they still should travel. But they should consult with their company's immigration lawyer regarding the documents they should carry when they travel.

Izikiel43 2 days ago

Any ideas how Eb3 final action date will move in the future? I noticed that for 2023 onwards more than 80k perms were approved.

  • proberts a day ago

    It's really impossible to predict; whenever I've tried, I've been wrong. This is in part because the movement is based largely on demand, which changes all the time and is unpredictable.

silverslate7 2 days ago

Do you have any guidelines for the amount of $ expected for the investment required for people applying for the E1 Treaty Investor Visa?

  • proberts a day ago

    That's the E-2 (the E-1 is the treaty trader visa and not based in investment) and most consulates require an investment of at least $100k regardless of the actual cost to get the company up and running.

hdivider 2 days ago

Are you seeing any changes in the difficulty of the EB1A, or is it about the same as in the previous administration?

  • proberts a day ago

    I think the same. I think the major changes are with the NIW, which is now much more difficult to get.

anothereng 2 days ago

I won the DV lottery do you know of any companies that are willing to hire remotely and then help with relocation to the USA?

  • proberts 2 days ago

    I don't have a list, unfortunately (and further I wouldn't be able to disclose names because of client confidentiality requirements).

0xy 2 days ago

I'm moving to the US on a K1 visa, is it possible to expedite an EAD on the basis of a job offer in an AI field?

  • proberts 2 days ago

    Expedites are available for all USCIS filings and while it's worth it to request it here, your reason isn't like to meet the expedite requirements, which are listed on the USCIS website.

    • Intermernet 2 days ago

      Is the correct term "Expedites", or "Expeditions"? Legal terminology seems to break language rules... The term for some (plural) things being expedited would be expeditions, but it seems from your response that, in legal terms, this would be expedites. This doesn't sound right. No source I could find agrees with the term "Expedites" as "plural of expedite". It generally returns something on the lines of "A third-person singular simple present indicative form of the verb "expedite.""

      • proberts 2 days ago

        Expedites as a noun like invites, arguably not grammatically correct but in common use so correct from a usage standpoint.

        • Intermernet 2 days ago

          Thanks, I've never come across it before. Guessing it's more common in the US than Australia. Same with Invites/Invitations.

Valbeloru 2 days ago

Hi. Practically, do I need to be an oficially employee for my employer to file H1B, or contractor is ok?

[removed] 2 days ago
[deleted]
atemerev 2 days ago

Were there any changes in requirements for O visa recently? Did they remove the job offer requirement?

  • proberts 2 days ago

    What was quoted below is really just codifying what existed in practice, that is, founders/owners of companies getting sponsored by their own companies. To answer your question, a job offer/employment is still a requirement and I haven't seen any major changes yet in the adjudication of O-1 petitions.

  • ahussain 2 days ago

    I'm pretty sure the job offer requirement is still in effect, and will remain in effect, since the O is an employment-based visa. What made you think it had changed?

    • atemerev 2 days ago

      https://rjimmigrationlaw.com/resources/o-1-visa-update-new-e...

      "USCIS now permits separate legal entities, such as corporations or limited liability companies (LLCs) owned by the beneficiary, to file O-1 petitions on their behalf. This change provides a significant advantage for entrepreneurs and self-employed professionals."

      I am interested if it actually works in practice.

shekispeaks 2 days ago

Hi peter, do you use any legal specific ai software ? Do you use ChatGPT in your work?

  • proberts 2 days ago

    We're starting to test the use AI to help us prepare initial drafts of documents.

ksec a day ago

Honest question. If I live in a country with little to no Capital Gain Tax, why would I want to move to US other than job opportunity?

iply 2 days ago

How hard is it to get approval for an o1 visa with no bachelors degree?

  • proberts 2 days ago

    Education is irrelevant. A PhD in and of itself doesn't help but it usually means that the individual has published, engaged in original research/work, etc. but someone can have published, engaged in original research/work, etc. without a PhD or any degree. So it's about what the individual has done, not his or her education. That being said, there's no question that USCIS's view of an O-1 petition is colored by the applicant's education and there's sort of a presumption that someone with a PhD qualifies for an O-1.

  • lukaszkorecki 2 days ago

    It's doable but you need a lot, and I mean a lot of documentation proving that you are indeed an alien with extraordinary ability. Any press mentions of you and your company, articles, proof that you're working with known companies in the US and more evidence like that will increase your chance.

    In fact I worked with Peter on obtaining an O1 while not having a degree, I was a CTO of a startup, moving from the UK.

[removed] a day ago
[deleted]
kedihacker a day ago

If I forge birth documents, will I get caught?

  • gcr a day ago

    Perhaps a different way to look at this is: what are possible future consequences of forging birth documents?

    My guess is that these consequences are likely to be extremely disruptive to you

_blk 2 days ago

Hi Peter,

Thanks for all that great insight.

I'm currently a Swiss national on E2 with my own biz but looking at partnering with an American (the form could be a partnership or S-corp but it's not set in stone.. Recommendations welcome. State of CO or potentially Wyoming). All the work I do for them currently is consulting under my biz (SMLLC) as investment but apart from my biz paying for some PCB manufacturers there's no flow of money, just a lot of time.

Now my current E2 business has only me as an employee and I'm not sure how the chances of renewal look in 1.5 years if stays that way. End goal is a good partnership on the new venture and US citizenship but AFAIK there's no path from E2. Do you recommend reapplying for a new E2 with the new venture or extend the current one or something else entirely?

From what I understand from the last E2 is that the embassy prefers majority control from the treaty investor which we'd have to discuss if that's a hard requirement

Thanks!

  • proberts a day ago

    There is an argument that it is harder to renew an E-2 visa when there are no employees and limited revenues than to get a new E-2 visa when there are no employees and limited revenues because a new E-2 is forward looking/potential. But I'd have to dig in deeper to the facts to make a firmer assessment. Regarding majority control, that's not correct; it's enough if your ownership is just 50%.

negrit 2 days ago

Hey Peter.

  • proberts 2 days ago

    The details matter (the type of green card application, the green card category, the position held then, the new position, etc.) so it's impossible for me to comment. You should schedule a consultation with an immigration attorney.

rundmc 2 days ago

Is there any way for immigrants to avoid the 27 vaccines mandated by the CDC?

  • proberts 2 days ago

    There are medical, religious, and other types of waivers.

trod1234 2 days ago

Hi Peter, thanks for doing these AMA's.

There has been so much in the news recently, both on immigration, birthright citizenship, potential suspension of habeas corpus, lack of due process, the effective setup of stateless regions (El Salvador), and other aspects that all boil down to a question that seems to be on a number of people's minds and centered on a single question.

While this is more of a generic question, it'd be nice to hear from an actual attorney that's practiced law.

When we speak of a 'rule of law', and its benefits to society, its generally understood from Civic's classes we all had to take, that there are components that must be met, which are not met under a 'rule by law'; the latter which is more generally understood to be common to totalitarian regimes where they do what they want with the tacit approval of kangaroo courts, usually with some sort of reference to Lavrentia Beria's infamous quote, "Show me the person I'll show you the crime".

While there is some debate on the specific components of a 'rule of law', they almost all require: Independent Objective Judiciary, Equality under the Law, Access to Justice, Fundamental Rights, and Transparency (if I'm remembering my civic's correctly).

The primary purpose and benefit to society of such being non-violent conflict resolution.

In many respects, in the past few decades, Judicial activism seems to have broken the first, Access to bring an action now requires access to a lawyer which in many cases is a retainer of an amount that exceeds the average person's yearly salary (unspent), Transparency seems to have largely vanished behind paywalls, bad laws, and contradictory readings.

The last remaining two are equality under the law, and fundamental rights which are directly tied to those other properties, and have been degraded by corporations in their legal actions and lobbying as a whole over time. The remaining components seem in dire jeopardy with stateless regions, which the court doesn't seem capable of addressing (given the other failures that have occurred over the past 20 years that remain broken).

I hear all the time that we have a country that has a rule of law, but that isn't what the average person is seeing when they look at these things objectively.

Just so you know, I've reached out to numerous attorney's for various contract issues over the years, the most recent related to professional certification where the company clearly failed in their obligations, but they also apparently have received broad indemnification via their government contracts. I mention this, so the perception is not just based on a trusted news initiatives media alone, but also backed by my own conversations seeking services that came from my state BARs referral service.

Is there something wrong with my understanding here? Do we actually still live in a rule of law? If my understanding is right, it doesn't seem like we do anymore.

  • proberts 2 days ago

    These are trying times and I think the proof will be in the pudding, whether courts at the appellate level, including the Supreme Court, push back against totalitarianism and uphold the law. That's an open question. And then of course, the executive branch has to abide by the decisions of the courts, which also is an open question.

    • trod1234 2 days ago

      Thanks again for the response and listening.

      I'll pray that we do somehow manage to push back against totalitarianism as a society.

ty6853 2 days ago

Not legal advice but I'm a US citizen and when I've refused to answer their intrusive questions the worst that has happened to me is they imprisoned me, stripped me naked and searched me, got a fraudulent warrant for an internal body search, and then sent me the bill after dumping me at the border when they found nothing.

Enjoy.

  • Exoristos 2 days ago

    Can you explain what fraud was used to obtain the warrant?

    • ty6853 2 days ago

      Yes.

      They claimed a dog alerted on me. An anonymous dog, handled by an unnamed officer in the affidavit, which was used as 3rd party inter-species hearsay via a HSI officer to the assistant attorney and judge.

      A dog did not alert on me. In fact it is against CBP policy to use dogs on a person, they are to be used on your articles.

      • csomar a day ago

        I think you posted from a new account for privacy and then mistakenly posted from your original account?

  • smcin 2 days ago

    Which entry point was that at, and did you enter by air or land?

    In particular if it was entering the southern border by land, I heard CBP behavior is much more aggressive.

bmink 2 days ago

If you were an immigrant with legal status who lives in the US, would you feel OK traveling? What precautions would you take, what information would you memorize?

  • proberts 2 days ago

    Yes. I still think that those with student or work visas or green cards should travel internationally. It's just a question of being smart and carrying the right documents. The right documents will vary depending on the status so I can't give a list but I'd recommend having a brief consultation with an attorney. Many like myself won't charge for a 15-minute consultation, which is all that this should take.

    • idontwantthis 2 days ago

      What would a green card holder need to carry other than their passport and greencard?

      • proberts 2 days ago

        Maybe just proof of residence in the U.S., such as a lease agreement or deed.

  • [removed] 2 days ago
    [deleted]
[removed] 2 days ago
[deleted]
skoush 2 days ago

Are you seeing an increase in RFE/denial rates for EB2-NIW? What advice would you have if you get an RFE? This is for an AI researcher at one of the 3 foundation model companies.

  • ianhawes 2 days ago

    What nationality and what is your current status?

drcongo 2 days ago

[flagged]

  • mc32 2 days ago

    Don’t you have to be guilty of a crime to be sent down there?

    For the vast majority of people who violate their visas, they simply get sent to their home country. If you’re willing to remain in your home country out of fear of US policies, it’s very likely your home country would take you back and not disown you.

    • _alternator_ 2 days ago

      While it’s not typical to be sent to CECOT in El Salvador, you don’t need to be “guilty” by the government’s position. They assert the right to send people down there based on allegations that have not been tested in any court.

      • mc32 2 days ago

        If you come here legally and don't commit a crime, they won't send you down there. If you come here legally and commit a crime, you'll get sent back to your country of origin. People being sent down there came here illegally.

    • nashashmi 2 days ago

      You can get sent there by your affiliation. You don’t have to necessarily commit a crime. And all the administration has to do is make an accident and send you to the wrong place.

      The vast majority are being sent to nearby countries as well.

    • barbazoo 2 days ago

      Lots of people being detained for extended periods of time at the Canada/US border. I wouldn’t be so optimistic unless your situation is bullet proof.

    • ty6853 2 days ago

      [flagged]

      • mc32 2 days ago

        And those guys are Salvadoran… right? Like if Mexico sends back a bunch of criminal gringos, what are we supposed to do, ask Mexico to incarcerate them for us? No we take them and put them through our system of justice and send them to the pen.

burnt-resistor 2 days ago

Hallo Peter! Thanks for putting yourself out here.

You gotta look up another immigration attorney in the Valley, Rajat Kuver. He's a super cool guy and has for years done work on complex commercial and family immigration cases.

Good luck to all your endeavors and happy weekend.

narenkeshav 2 days ago

Hey Peter,

On average, min and max - how many H1Bs do a Seed/Series A,B startups have?

From your experience.

Thank you for your time, Naren

  • proberts 2 days ago

    I'm not sure I understand what you are asking. Do you mean the average per startup or the total number? All I can say is that startups usually can sponsor H-1Bs without issue.

    • narenkeshav 2 days ago

      Thank you for responding, Peter. Total number.

      • proberts a day ago

        There's no limit legally; the only limiting factor is when an employer becomes an "H-1B dependent employer" and then the hiring of H-1B workers becomes much more onerous.