Comment by corysama

Comment by corysama 3 days ago

So, is there some amount of gradient-based optimization going on here? I see RGBD input, transmission, RGBD output. But, other than multi-camera registration, it's difficult to determine what processing took place between input and transmission. What makes this different from RGBD camera visualizations from 10 years ago?

markisus 3 days ago

There is no gradient-based optimization. It's (RGBD input, Current Camera Pose) -> Neural Net -> Gaussian Splat output.

I'm not aware of other live RGBD visualizations except for direct pointcloud rendering. Compared to pointclouds, splats are better able to render textures, view-dependent effects, and occlusions.

Reply View 2 replies

rsp1984 3 days ago

Except that no view-dependent effects that would benefit multi-view consistency are present in your splats.
So yes, it's very much like the RGB-D visualizations from 10 years ago, just with splats instead of points.

Reply View | 1 reply
- markisus 2 days ago
  
  Here is an example of a view dependent effect produced by LiveSplat [1]. Look closely at the wooden chair handle as the view changes.
  I'll concede that ten years ago, someone could have done this. But no one did, as far as I know.
  [1] https://imgur.com/a/2yA7eMU
  
  Reply View | 0 replies