Comment by yunusabd

Comment by yunusabd 5 days ago

4 replies

I was curious if the sensor would pick up other things like trees or other cyclist, but it seems like they accounted for that:

> We then log a sensor events [sic] if the majority of cells in the sensor frame agree to the same value within a threshold parameter [...]. This ensures that sensor events are only logged when large objects like cars block the sensor’s field-of-view , i.e., one or more small objects like branches or distance pedestrians in the sensor’s field-of-view will not trigger this condition. While there is no guarantee that this approach strictly identifies cars, we empirically saw during testing that passing cyclists and pedestrians rarely satisfied this condition at the typical passing distance due to the wide field-of-view of the VL53L8.

Also interesting that it's quite cheap to build:

> The whole system can cost less than $25 [...]

From the paper https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3706598.3713325

pj_mukh a day ago

So if I’m in a protected bike lane with a row of parked cars to my left wouldn’t it be flagging every parked car as a potential hazard?

  • ben-schaaf a day ago

    Unless there's enough distance to the bike lane every parked car in a row of parked cars is a potential hazard. It's even got it's own name: dooring.

    • fwipsy a day ago

      I assumed it could tell whether the car was passing you or vice versa.

  • davidhyde a day ago

    From the photos, there appears to be more than one sensor on the device which may be used to tell which direction the large object is coming from. Unless you were cycling backwards or mounted the device the wrong way around you shouldn't have any stationary cars passing you. Just a guess though.