Comment by Attummm
It sounds very intriguing indeed. However, the README makes some claims. Are there any benchmarks to support them?
> Built for performance we're currently 1000x faster than Neo4j, 100x faster than TigerGraph
It sounds very intriguing indeed. However, the README makes some claims. Are there any benchmarks to support them?
> Built for performance we're currently 1000x faster than Neo4j, 100x faster than TigerGraph
Those were actual benchmarks that we run, we didn't get a chance to write them out properly before posting. I'll get on it now and notify by replying to this comment when they're on the readme :)