Comment by intended

You may believe your position is: > should indeed be presented clearly. Exactly because I know some organisations like to shield themself from criticism, by having a intransparent process

but

> Because it is extremely hard to figure out what is going on. Lots of mysterious abbreviations. Unclear timeline.

> But in a real court, I can see the verdict and the laws that were broken. All in complicated, but readable english. Which makes it clear (usually). But in wikipedia to understand a indefinite ban, I have to understand global wiki community dynamics first?

your position aligns with someone who desires decision with serious consequences to be easy to understand.