Comment by A4ET8a8uTh0_v2

Comment by A4ET8a8uTh0_v2 13 hours ago

4 replies

View on Hacker News

<< It’s easy to blame people for not voting if you ignore the real difficulties in actually casting a vote for many Americans.

I hesitated while reading this part, because I wholly agreed with the first 2 sentences. Do you mean physically difficult in terms of barriers to voting or making a less direct comment about the usefulness of that vote? If the former, I think I disagree compared to other countries ( and the levels of paperwork needed ). If the latter, I would be interested to hear some specifics.

mulmen 8 hours ago

Physically more difficult. Purging voter rolls. Moving polling locations. Voter ID requirements. Restrictions on mail in ballots. Etc.

Reply View 3 replies
  • A4ET8a8uTh0_v2 7 hours ago

    I willing to give you moving polling locations, but with that minor concession.

    Can you explain to me like I am 5 why those are bad things? For a simple person like myself, one would think, data accuracy, voting system integrity, and verifiability would be of use and value to everyone.

    Reply View 2 replies
    • fugalfervor an hour ago

      Voter ID laws disproportionately affect a very specific subset of the population, one that reliably skews in one direction on the political spectrum.

      However, there is no evidence that voter ID laws reduce fraud, nor is there evidence that the absence of such laws introduces fraud.

      Something like 90% of voter fraud is people making mistakes on their ballot, or not realizing they were not allowed to vote. Also, voter fraud is rare and elections are already very secure.

      Introducing laws that don't affect the (already low) level of fraud, while making it harder for one party's voter base to vote, is not of use and value to everyone -- it is of use and value to the side that benefits from a reduction in the other side's votes.

      Reply View 0 replies