duskwuff 3 days ago

Not that it's necessarily wrong for it to not be listed there, though. The article on GWB is about him and what he did as president - it isn't meant to be a complete history of the United States between 2001 and 2009.

  • clipsy 2 days ago

    I agree -- which is also why the absence of Benghazi on Obama's wiki page is not, in my view, a sign of bias.

nailer 2 days ago

How is that remotely similar? There was not a scandal implicating George Bush regarding the Kolkhata attack.