Comment by crmi

Comment by crmi 3 months ago

6 replies

I think quoting that part alone, didn't make it clear I was referring to the whole article.

>...... "Oh Well."

May have been more apt.

Is eBay really anyones first thought when looking for a (non-collector) stamp to (actually) mail?

Perhaps he should have picked up a few £1 coins on eBay, use them to purchase some stamps from the post office?...

unwind 3 months ago

But, again, he was in the UK buying US stamps, so that the FSF could mail their answer back to him from the US. I don't think UK post offices supply all the world's stamps, buying that online from individuals who have them for sale makes some kind of sense, doesn't it?

I guess the a more "digital native" way would have been to first check if the USPS supports some kind of downloadable/printable stamping method, like QR codes or pre-bought labels (which, according to come early comment, they do).

Scoundreller 3 months ago

They needed US stamps.

  • crmi 3 months ago

    I didn't see any request for a return envelope or stamp. Author decided to include them (unless I missed something).

    • xp84 3 months ago

      It seems like common courtesy for me. Given the FSF are providing that service out of altruism, and are not the ones who neglected to give OP the license in the first place, it's only appropriate to not impose upon them to go buy stamps to send an international letter.

      • crmi 3 months ago

        What about the paper, ink, labour involved? Why not slip $10 into envelope instead?

        • db48x 3 months ago

          De minimis. You only include the extra envelope so that you can write your own address on it. Postage is the only real expense.