Comment by _heimdall

Comment by _heimdall 18 hours ago

Where do you draw that line though?

If you're talking about a person using an LLM, or some other ML system, to help generate their music then the LLM is really just a tool for that person.

I can't run 80 mph but I can drive a car that fast, its my tool to get the job done. Should I not be allowed to do that professionally if I'm not actually the one achieving that speed or carrying capacity?

Personally my concerns with LLMs are more related to the unintended consequences and all the unknowns in play given that we don't really know how they work and aren't spending much effort solving interoperability. If they only ever end up being a tool, that seems a lot more in line with previous technological advancements.

bluefirebrand 16 hours ago

> I can't run 80 mph but I can drive a car that fast

If you drive a car 80mph you don't get to claim you are a good runner

Similarly if you use an LLM to generate 10k lines of code, you don't get to claim you are a good programmer

Regardless of the outcome being the "same"

Reply View 3 replies

elliotbnvl 15 hours ago

You do get to claim that you’re a good getting-places-er, though, which is the only point of commercial programming.

Reply View | 2 replies
- bluefirebrand 15 hours ago
  
  Project Managers will tell you that "getting to a place" is the goal
  Then you get to the place and they say "now load all of the things in the garage into the truck"
  But oops. You didn't bring a truck, because all they told you was "please be at this address at this time", with no mention of needing a truck
  My point is that the purpose of commercial programming is not usually just to get to the goal
  Often the purpose of commercial programming is to create a foundation that can be extended to meet other goals later, that you may not even be remotely aware of right now
  If your foundation is a vibe coded mess that no one understands, you are going to wind up screwed
  And yes, part of being a good programmer includes being aware of this
  
  Reply View | 1 reply
  
  pixl97 14 hours ago
  
  I work with quite a few F100 companies. The actual amount of software most of them create is staggering. Tens of thousands of different applications. Most of it is low throughput and used by a small number of employees for a specific purpose with otherwise low impact to the business. This kind of stuff has been vibe coded long before there was AI around to do it for you.
  At the same time human ran 'feature' applications like you're talking about often suffer from "let the programmer figure it out" problems where different teams start doing their own things.
  
  Reply View | 0 replies

probably_wrong 16 hours ago

> I can't run 80 mph but I can drive a car that fast, its my tool to get the job done.

Right, but if you use a chess engine to win a chess championship or if you use a motor to win a cycling championship, you would be disqualified because getting the job done is not the point of the exercise.

Art is (or should be) about establishing dialogues and connections between humans. To me, auto-generated art it's like choosing between seeing a phone picture of someone's baby and a stock photo picture of a random one - the second one might "get the job done" much better, but if there's no personal connection then what's the point?

Reply View 0 replies