Comment by sanderjd

Comment by sanderjd 2 days ago

3 replies

I didn't say it's petty! I said it's not relevant.

My question at the beginning of the thread was: Assuming people are using a particular pattern, where LLMs are used to parse prompts and route them to purpose-specific tools (which is what the thread I was replying in is about), is it actually a good use of LLMs to implement that routing layer, or mightn't we use a simpler implementation for the routing layer?

Your point seems more akin to questioning whether the entire concept of farming out to tools makes sense. Which is interesting, but just a different discussion.

namaria 2 days ago

> It's fine to have a hobby horse!

> I didn't say it's petty!

You did.

And I already showed you made a claim that LLM was AI and that you agree that you were thinking of something akin to expert systems. When I explained why I think this is a signal that we are headed to another AI winter you started deflecting.

I am done with this conversation.

  • sanderjd 13 hours ago

    The term "hobby horse" does not imply pettiness.

    I don't think I've deflected at all. You're just talking about something orthogonal to the thing I was asking about in this thread, which (predictably) totally derailed the thread into an entirely different discussion.

    It's fine! Happens all the time.

  • [removed] 2 days ago
    [deleted]