Comment by bluGill
If it is just for people in the meeting we don't need 100%, just close enough that we remember what was discussed.
If it is just for people in the meeting we don't need 100%, just close enough that we remember what was discussed.
Written records are only accurate if they are carefully reviewed. Humans make mistakes all the time too. We just are better at correcting them, and if we review the record soon after the meeting there is a chance we remember well enough to make a correction.
There is a reason meeting rules (ie Robert's rules of order) have the notes from the previous meeting read and then voted on to accept them - often changes are made before accepting them.
I really don't see the value of records that may be inaccurate as long as I can rely on my memory. Human memory is quite unreliable, the point of the record is the accuracy.