mst 7 hours ago

OpenAI stuff in general seems (to me, at least) to be overly positive and confident in terms of how it replies.

While I make no foolish claims that it's perfect, I've found Claude feels much less arrogant, and was genuinely appreciative when one of its replies started with an (accurate, of course I checked primary sources to verify that) analysis of the first half of my question, and then for the more obscure second half said "I'm not sure if I can answer that without hallucinating, but here's some stuff you could try researching."

Certainly Claude's tone and "attitude" (FSVO) works much better for me than any other LLM I've tried, though mileage will, of course, vary.

(I have zero connection to the company and am still on a free account, I'm just quietly impressed relative to the competition)

mickael-kerjean a day ago

Yep and having it in a child toy is way beyond the border of creepy

  • akadeb 6 hours ago

    Currently our device is a toy accessory. And for children we are strictly focusing on `Story mode`. Where adventure stories / fairy tales feel more engaging. I think there's value in getting the AI to create epic stories consistently

  • 3np a day ago

    Moreso from the consent- and privacy angle.

scyzoryk_xyz 19 hours ago

You’re not the only one, same here.

I believe there will be interest in extracting insights from speech-related fields, performing arts etc. Kind of how there was this transfer of design principles in the 90’s-00’s from traditional typographers, letterform revivals, print techniques.

It’ll be interesting to see an evolution of expectations and culture emerge around AI voices depending on role. Maybe we’ll see these positive voice vibes as silly and naive the same way we see MySpace aesthetics today?