Versipelle 2 days ago

> Wouldn’t it be more desirable to hear an actual human on an audiobook? Ideally the author?

Of course, but it's not always available.

For example, I would love an audiobook for Stanisław Lem's "The Invincible," as I just finished its video game adaptation, yet it simply doesn't exist in my native language.

It's quite seldom that the author narrates the audiobooks I listen to, and sometimes the narrator does a horrible job, butchering the characters with exaggerated tones.

satvikpendem 2 days ago

Why a human? There are many cases where I like a book but dislike the audiobook speaker, so I essentially can't listen to that book anymore. With a machine, I can tweak the voice to my heart's content.

  • iamsaitam 2 days ago

    And get a completely wrong/bland but custom read of the book. Reading is much more than simply transforming text to audio.

    • satvikpendem a day ago

      Sometimes, I don't care if it's bland, I just want to listen to the text. There are a lot of Asian light novels for example which never get English audiobooks, and I've listened to many of them with basic TTS, not even an AI model TTS like these more recent ones, and I thoroughly enjoyed these books even still.

fennecfoxy 5 hours ago

It'd be nice if there were mainstream releases on GBC/GBA/PSP again too! But apparently if there's no money in something then people don't really wanna do it.

ks2048 2 days ago

With 1M+ new books every year, that’s not possible for all but the few most popular.

cchance 2 days ago

You really think people writing these papers actually have good speaking voices? LOL, theirs a reason not everyone could be an audio book maker or podcaster, a lot of peoples voices suck for audiobooks

senordevnyc 2 days ago

Honestly, I’d say that’s true only for the author. Anyone else is just going to be interpreting the words to understand how to best convey the character / emotion / situation / etc., just like an AI will have to do. If an AI can do that more effectively than a human, why not?

The author could be better, because they at least have other info beyond the text to rely on, they can go off-script or add little details, etc.

  • DrSiemer 2 days ago

    As somebody who has listened to hundreds of audiobooks, I can tell you authors are generally not the best choice to voice their own work. They may know every intent, but they are writers, not actors.

    The most skilled readers will make you want to read books _just because they narrated them_. They add a unique quality to the story, that you do not get from reading yourself or from watching a video adaptation.

    Currently I'm in The Age of Madness, read by Steven Pacey. He's fantastic. The late Roy Dotrice is worth a mention as well, for voicing Game of Thrones and claiming the Guinness world record for most distinct voices (224) in one series.

    It will be awesome if we can create readings automatically, but it will be a while before TTS can compete with the best readers out there.

    • azinman2 2 days ago

      I’d suggest even if the TTS sounded good, I’d still rather a human because:

      1. It’s a job that seems worthwhile to support, especially as it’s “practice” that only adds to a lifetime of work and improves their central skill set

      2. A voice actor will bring their own flare, just like any actor does to their job

      3. They (should) prepare for the book, understanding what it’s about in its entirety, and bring that context to the reading