9 points by croemer 2 days ago
I've seen a number of comments characterizing homebrew, the package manager, as bad but it was usually in an offhand way.
The most annoying thing I've come across recently is that one can't downgrade to an old version (unless there's a specific formula). Htop 3.4. shows CPU usage 40x too small (on macOS) and to fix that I can't use brew.
It's not perfect, but I like it fine. I definitely like it better than Fink and DarwinPorts, though those may be technically superior.
It's not super simple, but for your htop example, you could probably do something like the following:
# Create a new tap
brew tap-new $USER/local-tap
# Extract the specific version you want
brew extract --version=X.Y.Z htop $USER/local-tap
# Install the extracted version
brew install htop@X.Y.Z
Thanks, that almost worked, needed the following (extra --force tap of core and link --overwrite)
brew tap-new $USER/local-tap
brew tap homebrew/core --force
brew extract --version=3.3.0 htop $USER/local-tap
brew install $USER/local-tap/cmake@3.3.0
brew link --overwrite htop@3.3.0
Annoying CLI; the things called "casks"; the annoying behavior of updating ALL the packages on your system when installing only one program; and bad handling of broken packages.
I found all the beer-related terminology -- cask, keg, rack, Cellar, Caskroom, tap, bottle -- annoying and unhelpful and immediately disliked it back when it was new. I did use it a little for a while but not in a long time.
These days I use pkgin, which I like fine. Can't think offhand of when something I wanted wasn't available there. My impression is that homebrew has many more packages available, but apparently not any that I want.