croes 4 days ago

Exactly, kudos to the author because AI didn’t came up with that.

But that’s what they sell, that AI could do what the author did with AI.

The question is, is it worth to put all that money and energy in AI. MS sacrificed its CO2 goals for email summaries and better autocomplete not to mention all the useless things we do with AI

Reply View 4 replies
  • relativ575 4 days ago

    > But that’s what they sell, that AI could do what the author did with AI.

    Can you give an example of what you meant here? The author did use AI. What does "AI coming up with that" mean?

    Reply View 3 replies
    • murkt 4 days ago

      GP commenter complains that it’s not AI that came up with an idea and implemented it, but a human did.

      In the few years we will see complaints that it’s not AI that built a power station and a datacenter, so it doesn’t count as well.

      Reply View 1 reply
      • croes 4 days ago

        Some people already said it’s useless to learn to program because AI will do, that‘s the hype of AI not that AI isn’t useful as such like parent comment suggested.

        They push AI into everything like it’s the ultimate solution but it is not instead is has serious limitations.

        Reply View 0 replies
    • croes 4 days ago

      It’s about the AI hype.

      The AI companies sell it like the AI could do it by itself and developers are obsolete but in reality it‘s a tool that still needs developers to make something useful

      Reply View 0 replies