Comment by simianparrot

Comment by simianparrot 9 hours ago

So many arguing that "copyright shouldn't be a thing" etc., ad nauseam, which is a fine philosophical debate. But it's also the law. And that means ChatGPT et. al. also have to follow the law.

I really, really hope the multimedia-megacorps get together and class-action ChatGPT and every other closed, for-profit LLM corporation into oblivion.

There should not be a two-tier legal system. If it's illegal for me, it's illegal for Sam Altman.

Get to it.

nucleogenesis 9 hours ago

> There should not be a two-tier legal system.

That’s a fine philosophical debate, but the law is designed by the rich to favor the rich and while there are a number of exceptions there is little you can do with the legal system without money and lots of it. So while having a truly just system would be neat it just isn’t in the cards for humanity (IMHO) so long as we allow entities to amass “fuck you” money and wield it to their liking.

Reply View 0 replies

fishpen0 6 hours ago

There is more to it than copyright when you start going down the path of photorealism. As much as it is a picture of Indiana jones, it is also a picture of Harrison Ford. As fun as it is to make hilarious videos of presidents sucking ceo toes, there has to be a line.

There is a lack of consent here that runs even deeper than what copyright was traditionally made to protect. It goes further than parody. We can't flip our standards back and forth depending on who the image is made to reproduce

Reply View 1 reply

simianparrot 6 hours ago

I fully agree. But since the average Joe has no chance legally against ChatGPT, at least Disney and other megacorps could.

Reply View | 0 replies

dartos 9 hours ago

Sorry, but have you paid attention to the legal system in the states?

Large corporations and their execs live by different laws than the rest of us.

That’s how it is.

Anything is else is, unfortunately, a fiction in this country.

Reply View 2 replies

simianparrot 6 hours ago

And? Two wrongs don’t make a right.

Reply View | 1 reply
- dartos 6 hours ago
  
  There’s no “and.”
  I’m just stating a fact. No discussion of wrong or right or whatever.
  Just pointing out how there is no more rule of law in the US. Idk when exactly it disappeared, but it’s definitely not present anymore
  
  Reply View | 0 replies