Comment by jart

Comment by jart a day ago

14 replies

Yeah it's similar to how Facebook is blamed for social malaise. Or how alcohol was blamed before that.

It's always more comfortable for people to blame the thing rather than the person.

InitialLastName a day ago

More than one thing can be causing problems in a society, and enterprising humans of lesser scruples have a long history of preying on the weaknesses of others for profit.

  • jart a day ago

    Enterprising humans have a long history of giving people what they desire, while refraining from judging what's best for them.

    • collingreen 10 hours ago

      This is fine statement on its own but a gross reply to the parent.

PeeMcGee 20 hours ago

I like the facebook comparison, but the difference is you don't have to use facebook to make money and survive. When the thing is a giant noisemaker crapping out trash that screws up everyone else's work (and thus their livelihood), it becomes a lot more than just some nuisance you can brush away.

  • friendzis 17 hours ago

    If you are in the news business you basically have to.

jplusequalt 10 hours ago

Marketing has a powerful effect. Look at how the decrease in smoking coincided with the decrease in smoking advertisement (and now look at the uptick in vaping due to the marketing as a replacement for smoking).

Malaise exists at an individual level, but it doesn't transform into social malaise until someone comes in to exploit those people's addictions for profit.

itishappy 12 hours ago

I think humans actually tend to prefer blaming individuals rather than addressing societal harms, but they're not in any way mutually exclusive.