matser a day ago

It's something new IMO but we are definitely working on improving UX still. Fixing the overscroll issue as we speak. I'm assuming you're using mobile, would you prefer it of the 'tiles' all started in an open state?

It is not an experiment in how bad front end design can be pushed to be... Although that would be a fun blog post

Reply View 3 replies
  • meowface a day ago

    I think the site looks fine. Just remove whatever is changing the scrolling and adding "smoothness" to it or whatever. Showing stuff as you scroll is cool, but interfering with the scrolling itself is not cool.

    Reply View 0 replies
  • lugao a day ago

    I am not on mobile. It all boils down to the way decade old convetions/expectations are broken.

    The things that look like buttons (and are spans in the html code, not even anchors!) trigger non-local transitions (the left panel thing) when hovered... and they close the opened panel when clicked, so if I move my mouse to click on it the end result is a panel that flashes.

    I need to keep ignoring the usual button affordance of being clicked and force myself to think they are tiggered on hover.

    If this isn't bad UX I don't kown what it is.

    Reply View 0 replies
  • zote a day ago

    While you're here the little colored buttons, that expand to show more info are neat (note the first one in this article has template text at the moment) ; and when they expand and highlight the text with color they can clip other nearby text

    Reply View 0 replies
nkozyra a day ago

I think you can look at UX like this less like a web page and more like a presentation. In that framing it's more palatable.

In general we consume blogs more like traditional web pages, so it feels ... "wrong," but in some ways it keeps all of the content at hand and lets you navigate linearly or back and forth pretty reasonably, the way you might traverse a PPT.

Reply View 0 replies