Comment by jpalawaga

Comment by jpalawaga 2 days ago

10 replies

So you're not denying climate change, just the effects of it. I'm not sure that's any better.

We call it climate change because warmer weather produces higher variance in weather patterns--you're adding entropy into the system. Overall warmer, but more rain (and mud/rockslides), more wind, more lightning, etc etc.

rmah 2 days ago

As I read it, he's not denying the effects either. He's just saying that not everything bad that happens wrt climate and weather is due to "climate change". Sometimes, it's just variations, which have always happened.

  • ars 2 days ago

    These days everything is blamed on climate change. And when people point out natural variation, they get bashed.

    A recent example is the CA fires, there is zero evidence linking them to climate change - they did a study and found no effect - which of course was reported as "climate change to blame".

    • ayolisup 20 hours ago

      Unless we're talking about two different studies, saying you misinterpreted it is an understatement (https://www.worldweatherattribution.org/climate-change-incre...)

      • ars 3 hours ago

        No, I did not misinterpret it. That study does not show what you think it does. i.e. the actual data does not lead to the conclusion presented. The actual data shows zero effect, the written conclusion is a work of fiction.

    • inetknght 2 days ago

      > there is zero evidence linking them to climate change - they did a study and found no effect

      Can you point to this study? Or at least point to this "they" to whom you're referring?

    • siffin a day ago

      What are you talking about? The burden is on you to explain how manipulating the chemical makeup of the atmosphere DOESN'T have a direct impact, even at the tiniest levels (1ppm).

      At the levels we're at now, CO2e imbalances definitely impact every single weather event on the planet to some degree, and you'd have to be delusional not to accept that.

      • ars 3 hours ago

        When the level of random variation is greater than the change attributed to an event it's not possible to claim an event caused something. The random changes overwhelm and possible change.

        If you want to claim a change anyway, the burden is on you to do the modeling and math to prove it.