Comment by Kye

Comment by Kye 2 days ago

14 replies

>> More information: Shimpei Nishimoto et al, Infrared Bubble Recognition in the Milky Way and Beyond Using Deep Learning, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan (2025). DOI: 10.1093/pasj/psaf008

It links to a doi.org URL which directs the browser to what you linked.

shagie 2 days ago

And has the value of "it doesn't go dead as easily" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifier

> The DOI for a document remains fixed over the lifetime of the document, whereas its location and other metadata may change. Referring to an online document by its DOI should provide a more stable link than directly using its URL. But if its URL changes, the publisher must update the metadata for the DOI to maintain the link to the URL. It is the publisher's responsibility to update the DOI database. If they fail to do so, the DOI resolves to a dead link, leaving the DOI useless.

More about it at Digital Object Identifier (DOI) Under the Context of Research Data Librarianship - https://doi.org/10.7191%2Fjeslib.2021.1180

  • jgord 2 days ago

    I thought thats why we had urls not only IP addresses ..

    which reminds me, who has control over DOI.org ... eg. is it DOGE-safe ? likewise arXiv .. can it easily be co-opted / subsumed ?

    • sebmellen 2 days ago

      I’ve met the folks behind DOI. Very nice people (Jonathan Clark in particular).

      It’s an independent foundation and they have backups/contingency plans established with major universities to preserve the DOI records in the event the foundation fails.

      https://www.doi.org/the-foundation/board-and-governance/

      • jgord 2 days ago

        .. we need a Foundation .. and a second Foundation :]

        • hkt 2 days ago

          It's just like O'Brien always said.. you've _got_ to have a redundant backup.

          (Third foundation?)

      • j-pb 2 days ago

        Their whole organisation should have been a hash function...

        DOI must die

    • __MatrixMan__ 2 days ago

      Maybe it would be better to identify papers via a hash of their contents so that there's nothing to co-opt.

      • jgord a day ago

        ... theres an argument to having arXiv paper hashes, and/or important digitalia checksums put on a blockchain.

        detect-ability of state-actor post-facto editing : DEI related or otherwise