Comment by akimbostrawman

Comment by akimbostrawman 10 months ago

2 replies

The navy backdoor claims are unsubstantiated FUD unless you can point them out in the freely available and accessible code. Not to mention that they created the tool to also use themselves.

They also haven't had any influence or control in the development of todays tor project that has existed for over 20 years and despite a massive amount of attacks and research there has never been found anything.

That does not mean there aren't serious drawbacks that are more worth pointing out such as why bother with a very complex and noisy backdoor when you can just covertly create enough nodes to do traffic correlation.

thrwaway1985882 10 months ago

> That does not mean there aren't serious drawbacks that are more worth pointing out such as why bother with a very complex and noisy backdoor when you can just covertly create enough nodes to do traffic correlation.

Winner winner chicken dinner.

FVEY's annual budget is $1.7bn + $1bn + $122mm (NZ :3) + $4.6bn + $classified billion.

You think those guys can't mount a Sybil attack against https://metrics.torproject.org/ ?!

  • akimbostrawman 10 months ago

    to be fair tor project is monitoring new nodes so it would need to be done slowly over time. still its the biggest threat to the network hence everybody should consider running no/low risk guard and middle nodes.