Comment by latexr

Comment by latexr 2 days ago

39 replies

View on Hacker News

> being vegetarian doesn't exclude you from the necessity of killing in order to live. You're just killing forms of life that you emphasize with less, which is very reasonable and rational but also not materially different.

That’s like saying you kill chickens to eat eggs. You don’t kill a plant to eat its fruit. In fact, plants benefit from animals eating what they produce, be it oranges or tomatoes or something else and crapping the seeds somewhere else for proliferation.

AlexandrB 2 days ago

The dark truth about keeping chickens and many other poultry is that they hatch in an approximately 1:1 male:female ratio, but can't be kept in that ratio without severe conflict and stress. Thus, hatching chickens to keep for egg-laying requires killing most of the male chicks. So yes, you have to kill chickens to eat eggs.

Reply View 6 replies
  • veidr 2 days ago

    The "severe conflict and stress" part may be hard to understand for the cityfolk; you have to kill chickens to eat eggs, or else they will do it.

    Reply View 0 replies
  • osullivj 2 days ago

    Same for dairy cattle: males are redundant. My grandfather was an AI pioneer in the UK in the 1940s. AI being artificial insemination of dairy cattle....

    Reply View 1 reply
    • lotsofpulp 2 days ago

      I mean, dairy cattle also have the issue of keeping the female pregnant and then taking the baby anyway. And then, once they are done producing milk, what do you do with a giant animal?

      Same with chickens that lose the ability to produce eggs.

      Reply View 0 replies
  • thijson 2 days ago

    We put the redundant roosters in the woods, let nature do the killing for us. They didn't last one night.

    Reply View 2 replies
    • sethammons 2 days ago

      Getting eaten alive makes you feel better than euthanizing them quickly?

      Reply View 1 reply
      • 0x457 a day ago

        Well, at least a wild animal had something to eat?

        I'd say main benefit is not doing it youself.

        Reply View 0 replies
burnished a day ago

That is pretty much just fruit. Vegetables are typically either the whole body of the plant (like carrots) or a vital part.

Reply View 0 replies
6510 2 days ago

I killed so many slugs eating my broccoli it started to get to me. I technically didn't kill them myself, I put the cannibals in a bucket together. 1/3 to 1/2 bucket per day. About 30 full buckets for 20 broccoli plants of which about 8 were ruined.

Reply View 8 replies
  • j-krieger 2 days ago

    Same. Buckets upon buckets. You can’t even feed them to the chickens, critters who eat literally anything won‘t eat slugs.

    Reply View 2 replies
    • latexr 2 days ago

      I have seen a cat gobble a slug, so your mileage may vary.

      Reply View 0 replies
  • latexr 2 days ago

    The conversation is about the necessity of killing what you eat. Those slugs have nothing to do with either argument nor were they a necessary casualty.

    Reply View 4 replies
    • burnished a day ago

      I think in practice pest control does require killing the pest, and in that example was a necessary part of growing broccoli to harvesy

      Reply View 0 replies
    • amanaplanacanal 2 days ago

      Not sure how killing things and then not eating them is morally superior. If you aren't eating meat you are probably getting most of your calories from grains and legumes. The people that grow and store those for you are killing a lot of animals to get them to your grocery store.

      Reply View 2 replies
      • latexr 2 days ago

        This response feels quite emotional, so I’ll start by saying there was no judgement in my comment. At no point have I made a comment on the morality of the matter. Furthermore, not only do grocery stores not even enter into the conversation, you are assuming to know what the people who grow and sell the food at my local markets eat. I assure you, you do not.

        I think you’ll benefit from this video. Don’t let yourself be consumed by emotions of an imaginary argument. The entirety of your point is a response to something you imagined I said and not my words or intentions.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExEHuNrC8yU

        Reply View 1 reply
        • amanaplanacanal 2 days ago

          I think you misunderstood me, perhaps I didn't express myself well. You said the slugs were not a necessary casualty. Growing the acres and acres of grain and pulses necessary for a vegan diet necessitates the killing of way more animals (insects and rodents, etc) than the few cows, chickens, or pigs necessary to feed a carnivore. Every kind of agriculture requires killing. There is no other way to do it at scale.

          The real problem is the sheer number of humans we have to feed. Hopefully another couple centuries of low birth rates will help.

          Reply View 0 replies
wrigby 2 days ago

Admittedly this is pedantry on my part, but isn’t this only true for fruits? GP’s argument seems perfectly valid for e.g. carrots or mushrooms.

Reply View 21 replies
  • latexr 2 days ago

    Mushrooms are “fruits”. The “plant” itself is the mycelium underground and the mushroom is the “fruity” part which is produced to spread the “seeds” (spores).

    And fruits are broader than most people think. Many of the things you think as vegetables are fruits: pumpkins, zucchinis, tomatoes. But even outside fruits there is food you can harvest without harming the plant, like potatoes. And we haven’t even gotten into seeds and grains, like rice.

    So you can definitely live without killing what you eat.

    Reply View 20 replies
    • wrigby 2 days ago

      Hah of course you're 100% right on mushrooms - that totally slipped my mind. Am I completely out to lunch on root vegetables though?

      Reply View 0 replies
    • ThePowerOfFuet 2 days ago

      > Mushrooms are “fruits”. The “plant” itself is the mycelium underground and the mushroom is the “fruity” part which is produced to spread the “seeds” (spores).

      They are the "fruiting body" of the fungus, but biologically they are not fruit.

      Reply View 1 reply
      • latexr 2 days ago

        That is correct, which is why I used quotes. It is important to not get bogged down in pedantry and lose sight of the argument, though. The matter being discussed is if you need to kill what you eat, and I’m using “fruit” as a shorthand for the thing a plant produces to be eaten but is not the plant itself.

        Reply View 0 replies
    • fragmede 2 days ago

      aren't plants alive?

      Reply View 16 replies
      • latexr 2 days ago

        They are, and you don’t kill them or harm them to eat the things they produce with the purpose of being eaten and spread. If you want to engage in the conversation, please make an effort to do so in good faith and actually address the arguments. If you’re only going to make basic queries everyone already agrees with, we’re just wasting time and space.

        Reply View 15 replies