Comment by rockwotj
SQLites alternative in rust is a thing though
SQLites alternative in rust is a thing though
No I might not. In these similar situations, I will use sqlite, unless someone can point out one of the items listed above as a reason to use something else.
Just because you don't like it doesn't make it not an alternative. Even if it's objectively worse, it's still an alternative.
> Just because you don't like it
Read my post again. Sympathy or lack thereof don't factor into this equation. This is about battle-testedness and features. I don't make technical decisions based on emotions.
perhaps instead of `successor` you could say `rust fork` or `alternative`. Successor implies the original is dead or deprecated, or no longer going to be used, which is very far from the truth.
Can't wait to get my Blazingly Fast™ Managed Cloud SQLite for only 0.0001$ per virtual compute second.
I think you’re looking for LiteFS
Also Cloudflare D1, announced just a couple months earlier:
"alternative" implies that this is either on a comparable level of battle-testedness and feature completeness as sqlite, or that it solves problems that sqlite has, or that is delivers substantiable, or at least noticeable advantages over sqlite.
So, which of these points apply?