Comment by lolc

I understand this thread started with you objecting to the assumption that polonium is harmful to humans. Going so far as to suggest that anything short of an RCT is not enough.

Yet even if I read RCT results concluding polonium to be harmless, I would distrust that conclusion, not my understanding.

Somehow we're doing this epistemology thing differently. It feels to me like you live in a world of impossibly high standards. Or you just like to argue hypotheticals.