Comment by Retric

Comment by Retric 2 months ago

3 replies

Not so fast, billions of investment wasn’t spent on just 50 GWh of electricity.

The final step of training one specific model might have used 50 GWh which only costs what 0.011 billion? What the fuck do you think they are spending the rest of that money on?

And what do you think environmental impact of that spending was?

andymasley 2 months ago

Most of that money went into infrastructure + human talent, with energy costs at the tail end. I'd be happy to include the energy costs of producing the materials, feeding the humans and moving them around etc. but those aren't usually included in environmentalist critiques of the energy used in training. I couldn't use the original article to unpack every possible interpretation of how much energy was used without it turning into a book. If we did the same for plane rides we'd also need to include the energy cost of assembling the planes, training and feeding the human pilots etc.

  • Retric 2 months ago

    Fair enough, I’m not saying you have to do the analysis.

    I was working from a rough order of magnitude estimate from their spending and calling their numbers BS.

    Airlines are a better studied industry so you can find academic literature or use direct fuel costs which is a large enough cost you can get fairly close just using it alone.

  • jraph 2 months ago

    > feeding the humans

    You shouldn't include this, because they would exist and eat anyway, and probably the same thing (unless, maybe, their habits are changed).