Comment by kevin_thibedeau

Comment by kevin_thibedeau 3 months ago

5 replies

FCC is a special cause because private entities are using a public resource that must be managed. The content controls were a way to prevent Hearst style journalism spreading to radio and television. It worked well until the era of entertainment news developed.

brookst 3 months ago

How about copyright infringement, false advertising, sharing classified documents, tobacco advertising? There are a LOT of special cases.

Maybe there shouldn’t be and all of those things should be free from government interference, but the status quo is that plenty of speech is regulated.

  • kevin_thibedeau 3 months ago

    Copyright enforcement is not a form of censorship.

    • brookst 3 months ago

      So basically controls on speech that are good are not censorship and therefore good, but ones that are bad are censorship and therefore bad? That doesn’t feel like an especially defensible view.

      • mystified5016 3 months ago

        Copyright violation is not speech.

        Copying someone else's work and presenting it as your own is not protected speech, it is fraud. If you want to still consider this speech, someone is using it to actively and intentionally harm others.

        If you're so intent on free speech, how would you feel if someone followed you around screaming profanities and abuse? Are you engaging in harmful and immoral censorship by calling the cops to remove this person? Are you suppressing his right to free speech by taking out a restraining order?

    • Forbo 3 months ago

      It most certainly is abused that way. See every garbage DMCA takedown request submitted by scumbag corporation du juor.

      This doesn't even take into account the endless lobbying by Disney to pervert copyright law into what it is today.