I don't want to be rude but I don't think that your personal experience is of any interest. The only question is "are LLM relevant ?"
And the only way to assert that they are is to get numbers (big or small) and to compare them to alternatives.
Oh! Good point, we may not have the same definition of usefulness.
By useful I mean, to the world. That it affect the world in a good way. Maybe it's not the best technology to do something but replace the best way in an CO2 effective way. Maybe it is not a clean technology but increase overall fairness.
I don't know, but it had to have a good income to the world in a way.
> I don't think that your personal experience is of any interest
But you didn't specify what you meant by "useful," hence why I asked the question I did. So under such ambiguity, my assertion is absolutely a counterpoint to what you just said. I will ask again, useful for whom, by what definition?