CamperBob2 a year ago

To be fair there was a similar discussion a few days ago in which an SME remained unconvinced: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42566391

I don't necessarily agree with her conclusion because she wasn't participating directly in the thread and wasn't completely responsive to some of the points raised, but still, it appears that there are a few instances of difficult-to-read handwriting where OCR is still coming in second to skilled human interpretation.

Reply View 1 reply
  • jncfhnb a year ago

    That’s comprehension of English not reading characters

    Reply View 0 replies
BugsJustFindMe a year ago

I've posted these above, but I'll give you your own copy because the bits are free. Does your OCR work on these? Mine sadly doesn't. But if yours does, then I'll switch to it.

https://imgur.com/a/CDU6Lgs

Reply View 2 replies
  • jncfhnb a year ago

    The problem statement was text that random humans can read and OCR cannot.

    If you want to provide a good faith answer at least make it English. I assume this is French but it’s obviously much harder to evaluate on both ends when you’re mixing up the language.

    Reply View 1 reply
    • BugsJustFindMe a year ago

      I'm confused.

      Which parts of "OCR" and "human" stand for "modern english"?

      Are you suggesting that humans can't read or write in french? Because I can point to a lot of them who would disagree.

      Reply View 0 replies