Manuel_D 18 hours ago

Russia illegally spent something like $100,000 on political ads. Thats basically nothing compared to aggregate political spending.

  • mjparrott 14 hours ago

    It is mind blowing to me that this fact is not widely understood. A mountain was made out of a molehill. $4B was spent in 2016. $12B in 2024. Yet $100,000 somehow is believed to have made any difference whatsoever. Literally 0.0025% of the total in 2016.

    *Source: https://www.emarketer.com/content/political-ad-spend-nearly-...

    • seizethecheese 13 hours ago

      This is, of course, because both USA political parties run their own propaganda machines

    • lossolo 12 hours ago

      Because it's a good scapegoat, why take responsibility for losing an election when you can easily shift the blame to someone else?

  • epolanski 15 hours ago

    Meanwhile US channels this propaganda money through no profits.

    • dv_dt 14 hours ago

      Yup exactly the same thing is happening only with money laundered through nonprofits and political pacs. Once its there the same buy data and place ads & influence is completely legal - which makes the singled out ban on TikTok at odds with the stated purpose of it

      • Manuel_D 7 hours ago

        It's not the "exact same thing" since it's legal spending. If you and your friends want to pool money together and put up billboards promoting carbon free energy solutions, congrats you've formed a political PAC.

        This is distinct from a foreign entity, without registering as a foreign entity, directly participating in electioneering. While it's true that the Russian involvement in 2016 was overblown let's not pretend it's the same as legal political spending.

        • dv_dt 5 hours ago

          There are multiple organizations not registering as foreign entities who route a lot of political spending. Sometimes they are caught, but there is very little enforcement of political spending rules - and there is even more spending unchecked in the open skirting the transfers legally as far as I can tell.

next_xibalba 19 hours ago

Cambridge Analytica had zero effect on the 2016 elections. It was the mother of all nothingburgers. I encourage all who see this comment to dig into the truth of that case.

The huge difference is that while foreign adversaries run influence networks on other social media platforms (and are opposed and combatted by those platforms) TikTok (the platform itself) is controlled by the foreign adversary (the CCP).

  • throwawayq3423 15 hours ago

    It was more a proof of concept. If that could be done on a small scale, why not a large one?

    And elections are decided by margins, pushing them even slightly has massive, irrevocable consequences.