Comment by est

Comment by est 2 days ago

8 replies

The problem is, the world does't need meta/google/twtr either. The bill would eventually backfire US internet companies so bad.

mrtksn 2 days ago

Exactly how I expect things to pan out. Some 10-15 years ago the countries with dictatorships had the idea that they need to control the discussions on internet, now it is the US. I expect it to have cascading effect as Twitter, FB, Instagram etc are all foreign companies with known associations with the US government and intelligence and ban those everywhere fir national security reasons.

airstrike 2 days ago

I don't understand what this has to do with US companies at all. It's about foreign companies.

  • mrtksn 2 days ago

    Why do you think that Bezos and Zuckerberg have seen the light with the elections if the US government has nothing to do with these private enterprises?

    Twitter and Meta are foreign everywhere else, everywhere else except China TikTok is foreign as well and apparently they all lick their respective governments.

    • airstrike 2 days ago

      And if Twitter and Meta are found to be interfering with national interests in foreign countries and get banned or reeled in due to that, how is that a bad outcome for the world?

      • mrtksn a day ago

        it is a bad outcome because it means everyone is locked in their propaganda locality and theres no one to break the narrative. IMHO it’s beneficial to have a global network as we are living on a planet with artificial borders.

        • airstrike a day ago

          Less propaganda is always better. Less foreign propaganda doubly so. There's no benefit in a plurality of propaganda.

  • walls 2 days ago

    The government makes Meta and Xitter suppress Palestinian content, they can't do that to TikTok, so it's being banned.

    • airstrike 2 days ago

      This is demonstrably false as the discussion about banning TikTok predates the current conflict in Gaza by a long time.