p_j_w 20 hours ago

That’s not at all the same as banning the algorithm.

  • afavour 20 hours ago

    It’s not the same, no. I provided the link because it’s what I assume the OP is referring to.

    Limiting use to 40 minutes is not a ban but it still shows a view that extended exposure to it is harmful. To turn it on its head, if more than 40 minutes is viewed harmful for Chinese youth, why not American?

  • throwawayq3423 15 hours ago

    It's a clear sign the international version of TikTok, because of it's addictiveness and content, would never be allowed for a single minute in China by the people that know the most about what it is, and what is does.

    What more do you need to know?

    • dv_dt 15 hours ago

      If it was a legal requirement for Chinese apps in China, and this is the path for societal heath then why not pass that law for all social apps in the US?

      • throwawayq3423 14 hours ago

        Blanket content bans are the stuff of dictatorships, but restricting access to demographics that could be most harmed by it (children for example) is a good idea, and I wish the US would look into it.

croes 20 hours ago

That limit is independent of the used algorithm.

  • actionfromafar 20 hours ago

    How would you know? If you have only a certain time-window, you may need another kind of algorithm to retain ̶a̶d̶d̶i̶c̶t̶i̶o̶n interest day-over-day.

    • croes 19 hours ago

      I mean the limit is for all social media, the algorithm doesn’t matter.