Comment by amelius

Comment by amelius a day ago

5 replies

In addition:

• US data brokers can still sell data to foreign companies (out of control of US and thus indirectly to Chinese companies).

• Chinese companies can buy US companies (thereby obtaining lots of data).

If we killed user-tracking, then that would solve a LOT of problems.

mplanchard a day ago

> US data brokers can still sell data to foreign companies (out of control of US and thus indirectly to Chinese companies).

This is false. It was made illegal in April, 2024: https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7520

  • amelius a day ago

    > (...) to North Korea, China, Russia, or Iran or an entity controlled by such a country

    This is very limited and will not prevent indirect sales (like we now see happening with Russian oil for example).

    It is also why I said "indirectly".

    • mplanchard a day ago

      Yeah it could be broader for sure, would prefer it to be an allowlist rather than a blocklist, but the presence of a workaround doesn't make banning something pointless, and as the SC pointed out in their decision, a law does not need to solve all problems in one fell swoop in order for it to be valid.

      • amelius a day ago

        I just wish we could ban user-tracking (and data brokers) entirely so we wouldn't have this problem to begin with, or at least not to the current extent.

        Keeping the data securely inside our country is never going to work if China can simply open their wallet and spend billions of $ to obtain the data.

        • mplanchard a day ago

          Totally agree, and have written my congresspeople several times asking them to push for such legislation