JumpCrisscross a day ago

> If you believe in liberal values (with a small l), like freedom of speech, you lead by example

America is ridiculously pro free speech. That doesn’t mean we must then tolerate libel, slander, fraud, false advertising, breach of contract, et cetera because someone screams free speech.

The Bill of Rights exists in balances, and the First Amendment is balanced, among other the things, with the nation’s requirement to exist. That doesn’t mean the Congress can ban speech. But it can certainly regulate media properties, including by mandating maximum foreign ownership fractions.

  • greenavocado a day ago

    > America is ridiculously pro free speech

    Except for one group of people which have made any criticism of them carry legal consequences

    • JumpCrisscross a day ago

      > one group of people which have made any criticism of them carry legal consequences

      Jews? You know we have other federally-protected classes, correct?

      If you’re referring to Israel, no, there aren’t legal consequences for criticising Israel. Half of the vocal minority of the internet is constantly up in arms about Israel.

      • ok123456 a day ago

        30+ states have anti-BDS statutes that make it a crime to criticize Israel.

    • ok123456 a day ago

      Yes. They made it illegal even to stop buying their products!

    • BobaFloutist a day ago

      Oh, which group did you have in mind?

      • ok123456 a day ago

        The ones you can't boycott, divest, or sanction and hold a public sector job in many states.

AlexandrB a day ago

The "example" being banning things for nebulous reasons? If anything this is the US following China's lead in restricting what software their citizens can access.