Comment by tumsfestival

Comment by tumsfestival 2 days ago

1 reply

Kind of depressing how some people two millennia ago had bigger homes than most people alive today. Then again, if they were alive today their homes would be 10x the size.

YouWhy a day ago

The home in question is thought to have belonged to the wealthiest family around - which, for a society where economics are generational and local, practically means super-rich.

In modern societies such super rich people flock to major cities, but in pre-industrial societies relocating would leave familial assets under-attended. Accordingly a well adjusted wealthy person would arrange for an excellent standard of living adjacently to their possessions