Comment by jbgt Comment by jbgt a day ago 2 replies Copy Link View on Hacker News Landing boosters, reducing costs etc etc
Copy Link me_me_me a day ago Collapse Comment - Is that it? Landing boosters is not saving money as of now. Because a rocket engine is not a rental bike.Hmmm I wonder if there was a tech that recovered a spacecraft and tried to reuse it to cut costs... hmmm... no, nothing comes to mindAlso SpaceX is charging Nasa more than russians did when they had monopoly over space flights. Reply View | 1 reply Copy Link inemesitaffia 20 hours ago Parent Collapse Comment - Landing boosters saves money and helps with cadence.SpaceX is charging NASA less. Even Boeing is charging NASA less than Russia. Reply View | 0 replies
Copy Link inemesitaffia 20 hours ago Parent Collapse Comment - Landing boosters saves money and helps with cadence.SpaceX is charging NASA less. Even Boeing is charging NASA less than Russia. Reply View | 0 replies
Is that it? Landing boosters is not saving money as of now. Because a rocket engine is not a rental bike.
Hmmm I wonder if there was a tech that recovered a spacecraft and tried to reuse it to cut costs... hmmm... no, nothing comes to mind
Also SpaceX is charging Nasa more than russians did when they had monopoly over space flights.