theshrike79 20 hours ago

IIRC the PS3 Linux option existed because of this same tariff.

ToucanLoucan 18 hours ago

I often wonder what the ROI is on this. How much did Sony have to pay engineers to implement this interesting but seemingly pretty useless functionality vs. what it actually saved them in the aforementioned tariffs? I know the knee jerk reaction is to say it obviously saved them some money or they wouldn't have done it, but I've seen far too much corporate stupidity in my life to take that as a given. I'd love to see the data.

  • rsynnott 18 hours ago

    Well, in the end it didn't save them anything, because the EC didn't accept that having a toy basic interpreter made what was obviously a games console a PC. I can't imagine it was terribly expensive in the scheme of things, though.

    • throwaway48476 17 hours ago

      If it can run a desktop linux environment it's a PC. That said it probably should only count if the preinstalled software is Linux and not some games OS.

      • Y_Y 14 hours ago

        I would say that a PC should be compatible with the software and hardware of the IBM 5150.

  • pwg 17 hours ago

    When you ship millions of units of the kit, you only need a small savings per unit for the sum total to become a big enough saving to be noticeable to the financial dept. bean counters.

  • PetitPrince 18 hours ago

    Maybe it was just a passion project for the engineers or even Ken Kutaragi ? See also Net Yarose, Linux For Playstation 2, Other OS & Yellow Dog Linux for Playstation 3.

    • spookie 17 hours ago

      For sure, they had very interesting architectures. Used even in supercomputers as a number of them in parallel