Tostino a day ago

And they are calling it 'terrorism'. What a joke our country is.

  • potato3732842 a day ago

    Terrorism is simpoly what the government/establishment calls any politically motivated public action that includes crime or violence when anyone other than them does it.

    4chan/anon was screwing with websites -> terrorism

    Neo-nazis finding unsecured online printers at colleges and printing their propaganda -> terrorism

    Shoot a public figure because you think they've done a tone of wrong -> terrorism.

    Go on a bulldozer rampage against people who have wronged you -> terrorism

  • blacklion a day ago

    To be honest, it IS terrorism, by the very first definition.

    First terrorists (named so) was revolutionaries (not bolsheviks, but other parties) in Russian Empire, who go to Government official's office and shot them in the face with Nagant revolver.

    Look up Vera Zasulich, Dmitry Karakozov, Narodnaya Volya (organization), etc.

    It is TRUE terrorism, not bombing Christmas parade or marathon.

  • diggan a day ago

    I mean, it is. Just because you agree with it doesn't mean the label changes. And I don't necessarily hate what happened either, nor would I probably personally prosecute the guy. But lets not mince words, if you (try to) use violence against civilians for political/ideological/religious motives, that's pretty much the agree-upon definition of "terrorism".

    • epgui a day ago

      It was a targeted murder, it was not terrorism.

      • diggan a day ago

        Could you provide what definition you use for "terrorism"? Otherwise your comment might as well just say "No" and it contributes the same amount to the discussion.

        Besides, I'd say it's both. There is no denying it was a murder, nor that it was targeted and based on what I understand "terrorism" to be, it seems like that too.