colonelspace a day ago

Yep, as I mention above

  • tipiirai a day ago

    Cool. So the original claim is firm:

    > Dieter Rams is the man behind Apple's design philosophy.

    (no need for him to work there to impact Ive's stance on design)

    • devalexwells 20 hours ago

      I think the point is that "the man behind" connotes direct responsibility, not indirect inspiration. It's misleading wording.

      You might try "Dieter Rams inspired Apple's design philosophy."

    • lelanthran 18 hours ago

      I'd go with "Dieter Rams is the inspiration behind Apple's design philosophy".

    • jug 20 hours ago

      The man behind Apple's modern design philosophy is Jony Ive.

    • colonelspace 14 hours ago

      Well, you can be as firm as you like about the claim, it's still reads as if Dieter Rams worked for Apple.

      Dieter Rams no doubt had significant influences and admiration for those who shaped his work and design philosophy, should we credit those people as being behind Apple also? How far should we go? Perhaps we need to point out da Vinci is also one of the men behind Apple's design philosophy.

      Seems reasonable to suggest "the man behind" is generally understood to mean "the person directly responsible for".