raincole a day ago

Does anyone know where the debris landed? In the ocean? Or just burnt out in the atmosphere?

  • tjpnz 21 hours ago

    Wasn't going fast enough to fully burn up. There'll be small pieces of debris scattered over quite a large area.

RecycledEle a day ago

I think this was the first test of StarShip v2. I'd be surprised if everything worked after they redesigned the whole StarShip. That would be like refactoring Microsoft Windows by hand-typing new code and expecting it to run without errors on the first try.

inglor_cz a day ago

Looks like work of the Flight Termination System. Something measurable had to go very wrong.

  • olex a day ago

    While the telemetry was still going, you could see Ship engines going out one by one. Earlier when there was video there was what looked like flames visible inside one of the flap hinges, definitely shouldn't be there on ascent. Presumably something failed internally and caused the Ship to shut down before reaching target trajectory, at which point either FTS or the failure itself caused it to blow up, as seen on the Insta reel.

    • enraged_camel a day ago

      On the NSF youtube channel they pointed out that at some point the methane indicator started decreasing much faster than the LOX indicator, which points to some sort of leak. It would explain why the engines started to shut down.

  • JumpCrisscross a day ago

    > Something measurable had to go very wrong

    Or slightly wrong. An FTS is programmed to be conservative. Particularly on unmanned flights. Doubly particularly on reëntry. Triply so on experiments bits.

    • DeepYogurt a day ago

      Depends on the programmers I guess ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      • BuyMyBitcoins a day ago

        All of the exception handling was spent on the try/catch of the booster.

      • JumpCrisscross a day ago

        > Depends on the programmers I guess

        It depends on the Air Force.

  • enragedcacti a day ago

    It wasn't FTS, it just blew up: https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1880033318936199643

    • anothertroll456 a day ago

      That doesn't negate FTS.

      • enragedcacti a day ago

        Imo if SpaceX thought it was possibly FTS they wouldn't say RUD. They still had telemetry for multiple seconds as it pitched wildly and engines failed, if FTS didn't trigger then it probably didn't at all.

        • anothertroll456 a day ago

          Yeah I thought about that some more and at that altitude and speed the FTS is usually already deactivated.

[removed] a day ago
[deleted]
tsimionescu a day ago

Another failure, another few months of figuring out why this isn't working and can't stick to its flight path. They caused chaos for many commercial planes, so they'll definitely need some full reports to the FTA to know what they're doing about this, why the debris is falling over flight paths, and so on.