Comment by chatmasta

Comment by chatmasta a day ago

7 replies

Maybe they intend for it to speed up/start implementation of federal agencies and regulations. The intent is to exert control over an emerging market while it’s still comprised of cooperative participants. Regulators want to define the regulatory frameworks rather than relying on self-policing before it’s “too late.”

Let’s see if this survives the next administration. Normally I’d be skeptical, but Musk has openly advocated about the “dangers” of AI and will likely embrace attempts to regulate it, especially since he’s in a position to benefit from the regulatory capture. In fact he’s doubly well-placed to take advantage of it. Regardless of his politics, xAI is a market leader and would already be naturally predisposed to participate in regulatory capture. But now he also enjoys unprecedented influence over policymaking (Mar a Lago) and regulatory reform (DOGE). It’s hard to see how he wouldn’t capitalize on that position.

chronic4930018 a day ago

> Regardless of his politics, xAI is a market leader

Lol what?

The only people who think this are Elon fanboys.

I guess you think Tesla is the self-driving market leader, too. Okay.

  • chatmasta a day ago

    I don’t even use it. But in terms of funding, it’s in the top 5, according to Crunchbase data [0].

    [0] https://news.crunchbase.com/ai/startup-billion-dollar-fundra...

    • cheonic516442 a day ago

      > But in terms of funding, it’s in the top 5.

      WeWork had more funding than xAI.

      Not saying xAI will die, but you can’t look at funding.

      • chatmasta a day ago

        You can look at funding to see who will benefit most from regulatory capture, a phenomenon that raises the cost of entry into a market. Obviously the most well-funded participants will have the greatest motivation to increase barrier to entry.

        If anything, a well-funded company with a bad product is more likely to engage in regulatory capture because it limits their risk of exposure to a new entrant with a good product.

        • bilbo0s a day ago

          In this particular market though it's a bit useless because only well funded entities are really able to play here.

          Where are any of us gonna get 10,000 H100's?

          So it's not like you're overwhelming small players by throwing up regulations. Those players are extremely unlikely to get the compute they'd need to even experiment in the first place.

    • miohtama a day ago

      It's also quite decent, giving a lot of free request so I have switched from Claude.

  • DSingularity a day ago

    Hard to take comments like this seriously when you can’t even be bothered to be associated with it from your primary account.